top of page

When Transparency Dies, So Does Strategy

  • Writer: Aleksander Traks
    Aleksander Traks
  • Apr 21
  • 3 min read

Transparency sounds like one of those buzzwords you slap on a slide deck.

Everyone says they want it.

Few actually make it safe.

Most people are quietly afraid of it — even if they won’t say it out loud.

You’ve probably thought it yourself:

“If I tell the client what’s really going on, they’ll flip.”
“Let’s just fix it and hope nobody asks.”

I’ve been there. But most of the time, the fear is bigger than the reality. What really matters is whether the person in charge is the kind of person who shoots the messenger or listens.


A stylized depiction of British soldiers storming a Qing dynasty palace under a red cyberpunk sun, symbolizing how suppression of truth leads to collapse.
When honesty gets punished, leaders don’t get updates — they get invaded.

⚔️ Case Study: The Emperor Who Got Himself Lied To

Let’s go back to the Second Opium War in 1800s China.The Qing emperor wanted honesty or so he said. In practice, bad news got you punished. Hard. So his ministers stopped telling him the truth.

While British troops were literally marching through Chinese cities, the emperor was still hearing,

“We’re winning!”

By the time the truth reached him, British troops were already in his palace.

When transparency dies, strategy dies right after.


💻 We’re Not in Imperial China — But It’s Not That Different

No one’s getting executed for flagging a delay. But people stay quiet for the same reasons:

  • Last time someone spoke up, they got blamed.

  • No one built a habit of surfacing problems early.

  • Leadership says they want honesty, but their reaction says otherwise.

And so stuff gets buried. Quietly. Projects derail without anyone noticing until it’s too late.

I’ve seen it too often — not because people are lazy or dumb. But because the system doesn’t invite honesty.

An infographic showing how past experiences, leadership behavior, and systemic issues cause buried problems that derail projects, despite stated desires for transparency.
People don’t just “fail to speak up.” They’ve been trained not to.

🚫 More Spreadsheets Won’t Fix That

Transparency isn’t about dumping everything into a Slack channel and calling it a day. It’s about making sure the right people actually see what matters and feel safe saying what’s wrong.

Agile gets this right sometimes. Reviews, demos, check-ins, when done well, they build trust and help catch issues before they explode.

I’ve run teams where adding these review loops stopped waterfall-style disasters. They didn’t slow us down. They saved our asses.

Still I’ve had mentees ask, “But won’t that just make us look like we failed?”

It’s a fair fear. But unless your stakeholders are psychos, they’ll respect the honesty .And if they are psychos, better to find out now.


👀 Watch Out for the Transparency Trap

One warning: if there’s no psychological safety in the team, more transparency just turns into surveillance. People start feeling like they’re always being watched. That’s not transparency that’s control.

So don’t shove transparency down people’s throats. Build the trust first. Then turn up the clarity.

A person standing in front of the Temple of Heaven in Beijing on a bright day, evoking the contrast between appearances of power and the silence that can surround it.
It’s one thing to ask for truth. It’s another to make it safe.

What to Actually Do:

  • Don’t assume people feel safe speaking up — ask them

  • Use retros to find trust gaps, not just timeline slips

  • Talk in 1-on-1s about where transparency actually helps

  • Don’t just “accept” bad news — reward it

Transparency only works if people believe it’s safe to be honest. No fear, no spin, no games.

If they don’t believe that? You’re not leading. You’re just waiting for the next surprise attack on your palace.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page